Spaceport to the Stars

Posted in Uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , , on August 11, 2009 by suelange

http://www.spaceportamerica.com/

I’m sure I blogged about this once before, this spaceport for the wealthy. I forget now how many hundreds of thousands of dollars a seat on the maiden voyage costs. Suffice it to say my 401k is not robust enough to handle it.

That’s okay. Let the wealthy be the guinea pigs. Let them test the integrity of the o-rings this time out. Me and my peeps (i.e. the middle class) will wait ‘til that regolith mining operation on the moon gets underway. Or the restaurant at the end of the Universe. They’ll be climbing all over themselves to get me and my peeps to work there then. They’ll pay the fare at that point.

I do not fear for the safety of the wealthy aboard this maiden voyage (Ha, that’s funny, Virgin Galactic is the sponsor.). If I know the wealthy, each one aboard will have a personal o-ring specialist on the staff. Of course, being the wealthy, and by nature overly competitive, if their o-ring specialist finds anything out, they’ll keep it to themselves for proprietary reasons. So there is that.

Even if the middleclass achieves spaceflight in my lifetime, though, I may just skip it. I’ll open the souvenir concession instead. You know: My grandma went all the way to Mars and all I got was this stupid spacesuit.

The spaceport story doesn’t have anything to do with The Singularity, so here’s another item more on topic. This video from Transalchemy highlights all the problems with Transhumanism and The Singularity. Well done.

One final totally unrelated item for anyone in the Reading, PA area: Tuesday August 11: Sue Lange’s Prose Jam show on BCTV (ch. 13 on Comcast) will feature fellow author TK Marion. Tune in at 8pm edt.

See you there!

Sue Lange’s bookshelf at BookViewCafe.com

New Date for the Singularity: 12/21/2012

Posted in Uncategorized with tags , , , on August 6, 2009 by suelange

So I’m wandering around Borders checking out the featured titles when I find myself in the lo-rent district of new age bookery. An end cap there features an odd-ball book by the name of “The Complete Idiot’s Guide to 2012.” Great, I think, they must’ve moved the date for the Singularity up. Last time I checked it was the 2040s, 2030s at the earliest. Now who has decided Moore’s Law is much too conservative?

Not to worry. Turns out 2012 has nothing to do with the theory of The Singularity. 2012 is a whole different end-of-mankind-as-we-know-it scenario.

Having lived amongst Jehovah’s Witnesses and Pentecostals for a good part of my childhood, I’m mildly familiar with apocalypses coming every ten years or so. And since I survived the Comet Hale-Bopp and Y2K media events of recent decades, I remain skeptical of pseudocscientific predictions of when the world is going to end. I want to believe these predictions, but history has not been kind.

What struck me about 2012 is that somebody with influence in the mainstream publishing world had gotten behind it. That’s good enough for me. Wherever mainstream publishing goes, that’s where I go. Naturally I purchased the book.

To be honest, I’m only a short way into it and already I can see this theory is different. First, it’s based on higher maths. This is not a thick book, though, so I’m not sure how high the math actually goes. We’ll see when we get there. In addition the Mayans are still amongst us. I thought they all disappeared long ago, but no. And they are keeping the 2012 flame alive, updating it, no doubt, with current data. This is not just some allegorical thing written down thousands of years ago that may or may not speak to our present day concerns. Like the stuff in the back of the fridge, it’s alive and mutating.

To add to the higher maths, the book has information on real world phenomena such as sunspots, the earth’s magnetic field, and the photon belt, whatever that is. Then there’s the alignment with other famous apocalypses: Nostradamus, Biblical Revelations, and Edgar Cayce, whoever he is. I can see already I’m going to learn a lot about ancient cultures and new age mysticism with this book. I’m going to meet “my inner guru.”

The only thing the book doesn’t link 2012 to is The Singularity. I’ll have to provide that connection myself. The year 2012 is a little early for The Singularity but I can’t believe that these two phenomena aren’t related. First off, how will we reach the Singularity in 2020 if the world ends in 2012? Second, maybe the world won’t end in 2012, maybe we’ll just evolve into posthumans. Maybe that’s what the Mayans saw, but didn’t articulate very well because they had no words for robot, nanotech, and recombinant DNA. They did what they could with the tools at hand. Remember, they didn’t have a wheel at that point, how could they have known about current memory storage devices like DVDs? Maybe the current Mayans are unfamiliar with these things as well. On the other hand, maybe they are conversant with modern tech after all and are just not mentioning the word “Singularity.”

I think I’m going to start watching for 2012 just like I watch for The Singularity. I may even change the name of this blog to Singularity Watch in the Year 2012.

Counting down: 3 years, 4 months, 16 days. Get your sunglasses now while supplies last.

Sue Lange
Sue Lange’s bookshelf at BookViewCafe.com

True or False: Robots will soon be eating human flesh

Posted in Uncategorized with tags , , , , , , on July 29, 2009 by suelange

Lots of news in the world of nanotech last week. A couple of items were of particular interest to Singularity Watchers. Both come via the Hard SF yahoo group again (those cats are busy):

Flesh-Eating Robots: True or False?

What makes this remarkable is not the gruesome Night of the Living Dead aspect, but the illustration of how information, intelligence, knowledge moves. The flesh-eating story is akin to the Orson Welles debacle of early last century. Many people panicked at the thought of aliens landing in New Jersey (not sure why anybody would be worried about that, but there you go). This flesh-eating robot story had the same effect when it was reported to our little group. All those science fiction stories that have nanobots consuming entire planets came to our minds. How does one stop the Singularity when it is upon you? I accepted my fate and prepared for the worst.

Fortunately the Hard SF Group is a skeptical bunch. Within a day our fears were calmed by the follow-up link to the site that explained the flesh being consumed was vegetal only. The process seemed not much different than using corn to create ethanol. It’s not really like it, but the end results are the same: plants are consumed; motors run.

We heard the news, panicked, and were almost immediately reassured. By contrast, I’m not sure the world is over the War of the Worlds radio broadcast yet. Conspiracy theories abound. Today, through the efficiency of the hive mind, information is very close to being omnipresent and instantaneous.

I have no doubt that our intrepid scientists will one day create ‘bots that consume animal matter as well as plant matter. If one can conceive an idea, it won’t be long before we see a working model of it. Soon a small American town (in New Jersey, no doubt) will become victimized by runaway nanobots feasting on babies, pets, and bums sleeping in the park. In true Hollywood fashion, the town will be cordoned off and Bruce Willis, or Will Smith, or the latest up and coming hard body will be sent in to have sex with the starlet du jour and save the day moments before the entire population is consumed and the nanobots escape through the barricades.

I’m confident of the final outcome not because of misplaced hopefulness, or because I naively believe the CDC and nanotech community have a warm working relationship, but because what else can I do? I’m a typesetter for Cripe’s sake. Who can I go to, to complain about this? What organization can I send my money to, to ensure a speedy resolution to this latest crisis? I have no power, no link to anyone with power. I am not following the right people on Twitter, and they are not following me.

Regardless of how omnipresent the information is right now, (or maybe because of it) the world is too complicated, too convoluted. My brain is on overload. Please, science, could you discover the Theory of Everything, already? We need to simplify, compact and conserve, streamline. Throw out the excess; work with what works. Only then can I get my head around these flesh-eating nanobots feasting on the citizenry of small towns in Jersey.

Pi, The Bible, and The Singularity

Posted in Uncategorized with tags , , , , , , on July 22, 2009 by suelange

A week or so ago, the hardsf yahoo group discovered the Bible’s miscalculation of pi. I had never heard of this before. Neither had a number of the other members. We scrambled to find the truth concerning this mistake in the Infallible Document. The answer can be found in I Kings 7:23 which states in King James lingo: “And he made a molten sea, ten cubits from the one brim to the other: it was round all about, and his height was five cubits: and a line of thirty cubits did compass it round about.” Meaning the diameter is 10 and the circumference is 30. Plugging numbers into the circle equation, C = 2πr, gives us 30 = 2π5. Solving for π(pi) gives us 3. We all know pi is actually 3 and change, not just plain naked 3.

In the middle of patting ourselves on the back for discovering this chink in The Good Book’s armor, one of the more sober members dispatched a missive to the group with this Bible commentary. This webpage lucidly disagrees with the apparent imperfection. In a nutshell, it points out that a cubit is malleable. It’s only an approximation based on the length of a man’s arm. Depending on the handiest man available when building the ark, or the ark of the covenant, or Tower of Babel, the cubit will change. It’s a more or less type unit. Back in the day, there was no IUPAC system, no National Bureau of Standards, no “Paris clean-room that is kept at precisely 20 degrees Celsius,” i.e. the cubit was not standardized. Of course if you use the same man for both measurements, 10 cubits should relate to 30 cubits exactly and then the Bible would still be wrong, however, the the page also states “pi lies” and has “no relationship to reality.”

It goes on to prove it and winds up with this:

The solution of the Biblical pi-conundrum reflects perhaps the oldest conflict of all. In the heart of the garden of Eden there were two trees: the Tree Of Life from which Adam and Eve could eat freely, and the Tree Of Knowledge Of Good and Evil. Contrary to common understanding, this latter tree was as perfect as the rest of Paradise and its function was firmly fixed within the large scheme of things. What that function exactly was we don’t know, but its fruits were not suited for consumption, lethal when attempted. But before Eve ate, before the fall, hence with her truthful observations in tact, she noted that the tree was good for food, and that it was a delight to the eyes and that the tree was desirable to make wise. How this tree was to do this is unknown, but certainly not by having its fruits depended on for food and sustenance.

It’s a big step (too big a step) to say that scientists are the harvesters of the Tree Of Knowledge Of Good And Evil, but even if science will achieve her coveted Theory Of Everything, or rather Grand Overall Description, there will always be holes in the story, and science is too leaky a vessel for any Truth-seeker to put much hope in.

My response: I don’t think science is interested in the Knowledge of Good and Evil. Knowledge, yes; good and evil, no. In fact man’s fall from grace doesn’t have much to do with knowing things. Knowing things is not wrong. Making a judgment, i.e. deciding what is good or evil, that is the wrong. Once humanity brought morality into the equation, we lost our garden privileges. Regardless of what I think about the integrity of the Bible as a guidebook for humanity, the Eden story proves to me that there is little difference between the Judeo-Christian mythology and Buddhism. So whether or not science will find a theory of everything, there is perhaps a theory of everything spiritual.

Interesting though: If science will never know everything, intelligence will never be absolute; the Singularity is unattainable. Obviously the book on the Singularity ain’t written yet. Unless the Good Book turns out to be The Book after all. But then, the Bible is only infallible because the length of a man’s arm is not absolute. The absolute truth, then, is unattainable, unmeasurable, so we’re right back where we started: there can be no Singularity.

Sue Lange
Sue Lange’s bookshelf at BookViewCafe.com

Steampunk and The Singularity

Posted in Uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , , , on July 16, 2009 by suelange

Could there be two more disparate subjects than steampunk and the Singularity? Both have ties to science fiction: Steampunk started as a science fiction subgenre about 20 years ago; the Singularity has been embraced by the science fiction community as the latest best guess as to what our future looks like. Science fiction is where their connection ends.

From its beginnings as an experiment in one small corner of the literary world, steampunk has exploded onto the youth scene. With its stories set mostly in the Victorian age of corseted women and top-hatted men, it’s tailor made for fashionistas who love upsetting the mainstream. Who at this late date of extreme casual dress would have thought we’d be heading back to petticoats, bustles, fall front trousers, and waistcoats? In addition, the steampunk world is filled with mechanical computers, analytical engines, and steam powered technology. It is based on the idea that we could have gone digital without the use of semiconductors, electronics, and all things tiny. Things in a steampunk universe are big, brassy, and buildable by anyone with a blowtorch or crochet hook and a place to rest them on. Regardless of how lo-tech they are, however, steamage machines can do higher math, thanks to Charles Babbage’s difference engine.

Science fiction writers, apparently tired of neural networks and transistors as fodder, latched onto Charles Babbage’s idea, creating a new arena based on old materials. As modern tech gave writers little choice except to move into the virtual, the universe of science fiction seemed to be shrinking to molecular size. For those who work hard to learn the craft of describing the world, disillusionment crept in. The Singularity seems to leave little of the world to describe. The clever sf writers, slaves to the gee whiz factor, reacted. They encased fabulous new toys in velvet and made them work with gears instead of miniscule switches. The steampunk aesthetic was born.

Mostly what the steampunk authors did was create beautiful scenery. The punks latched onto the neo-Victorian universe because the punks have always loved beautiful scenery. And there’s nothing more beautiful than a pocket watch, a monocle, and a lace-trimmed, bustle-draped gown packed into a dirigible basket, steamship stateroom, or dining car of an 18th Century train. Things in steampunk are tangible and they hiss. Who, punk or otherwise, can resist that?

The Singularity on the other hand is all electronic. It’s quiet and almost invisible: a logical conclusion to our present reality. Sure it’s the best hope for life eternal, but it relies on plastic and other miracle materials yet to be discovered and not romantic in the least. There’s no hissing. Other than at the generating plants required by the ac system of electrical delivery, there is no place for steam in the future of the Singularity. As our tools get smaller the aesthetics get harder to see or care about. Even the robots are becoming disappointing. They’re starting to look more and more like humans; they have skin instead of metal plates. There’s very little new information to play with, nothing to make our imaginations soar. On top of that things are getting safer. Life is less risky, more predictable. As the sky becomes limitless it becomes less interesting to look at.

Why are these two mostly unrelated phenomena even being compared? Because they are occupying my head, that’s why. The Singularity is always with me. Steampunk, however, is a new arrival. BookViewCafe.com, the authors’ collective of which I’m a member, has decided to publish an anthology of steampunk stories. We have a great premise (which cannot be revealed until the formal announcement has been made) based on all kinds of Victoriana–something I know nothing about. I volunteered to contribute a story to the book, so I thought I’d do a little research to find out what makes steampunk tick. Steam obviously, but not really. Steampunk is only marginally about steam. What it really is about is the punk movement; it’s an extension of that in fact. What is punk? It’s mostly an anti-mainstream movement that embraces above all else the DIY (do it yourself) philosophy.

The DIY aspect of steampunk is what makes it so different from the Singularity. We cannot achieve the Singularity without the workings of a massive infrastructure of knowledge and its delivery. We need not only the Internet and a pile of computers, but a lot of people to be on board working through problems in the development of new tech. And lots of money for specialized tools and materials will help.

Steampunk, punks in general, and the whole DIY movement, place an emphasis on creating things with your hands out of available materials, stuff you can get free or cheaply from Home Depot. And in general it’s an all by yourself type thing. Mainstream culture is eschewed. You don’t need to buy other people’s ideas, you have your own. There is nothing that will bring the Singularity to a grinding halt quicker than if people go off by themselves.

As the Singularity pushes us into a virtual life where only our brains are needed to define ourselves, the DIY philosophy emphasizes work with our hands and development of physical skills through repetitive movement of muscles. It places an emphasis on the physical world. The brain is required not as the vessel of the experience, but to make the real vessel–the machine, the body–work. The brain is not the be-all and end-all. It is simply another tool in the belt.

Steampunk could very well just be a fad. Maybe it’s like the swing movement of about ten years ago where everyone was running around in zoot suits and pointy toed shoes and using cigarette holders. They all jump jived onto that bandwagon, but where are they now? Still listening to the Voo Doo Daddies? Probably not. The same sort of thing could easily happen with steampunk in five or six years. The kids will move onto something else. Youth culture has to do that, that’s how it works. If it stays static, it is no longer youth culture, it is mom and dad.

What will remain, though, once we’ve moved beyond steampunk, is the DIY philosophy. Humans cry for something to do with their hands besides manipulate a rodent-like device. Regardless of how much we love our tech and the superior intellectualized world it has given us, we will always want to create things with our hands, do things with our hands. We will strive to develop hand-to-eye coordination and work through the challenges of physical reality to define ourselves.

The Singularity will come or it won’t, but one thing is certain, post humans one way or another will always include a contingent of folks that make their own tech, their own art, their own lifestyle. There will always be a DIY punk movement, steam or otherwise.

Sue Lange
Sue Lange’s bookshelf at BookViewCafe.com

Mind Controlled Wheelchair

Posted in Uncategorized with tags , , , , on July 9, 2009 by suelange

Last week the Christian Science Monitor had this story about Toyota’s new mind controlled wheelchair.

Not much to complain about with this one, but the comments below the article were fun. They joked about hoping the controllers were not thinking about anything complicated like last night’s game, or today’s sit com situation, or tomorrow’s consequences of higher math, when they were out and about. They envisioned unfortunate accidents with hapless pedestrians (as if that sort of thing didn’t ever happen now). Somebody got pissed at the levity surrounding this major breakthrough for the disabled. As if joking about tech for the disabled was the same as joking about the disabled.

I suppose it’s true: we should stay serious when discussing our sacred, exalted tech. On the other hand, as far as I’m concerned the purpose of tech is to serve as fodder for humor, regardless of what the tech is about. It all makes good entertainment.

A mind controlled wheelchair is certainly wonderful, but if I were the disabled person who this was designed for, I’d be wondering when the mind controlled artificial limbs were going to arrive. Especially if I’d already learned how to get around using my arms or even better: my voice. The plain old vanilla wheelchair was the breakthrough and this is not much of an upgrade.

The importance of this, then, is not what it can do for the disabled. What is exciting is that it’s a direct precursor to mind controlled everything. Cars and chairs will be great, but I want to go further. I want everything to move without my expending any more energy than what it takes to produce a thought. Not since the clap-on light switch have we seen such a breakthrough in labor savingness. And I can’t wait for its application.

Housework will get done Betwitched-style. Just a wiggle of the nose and the place cleans itself: dusts, vacuums, launders, organizes the shoes.
Obviously we’re not there yet, but this is a step in the Darren and Samantha Stevens direction. And anything that makes good on the Hollywood promise of suburban happiness is okay in my book.

Sue Lange
Sue Lange’s bookshelf at BookViewCafe.com

Be the First on your Block to get Your Very Own Neural Interface System

Posted in Uncategorized with tags , , on July 1, 2009 by suelange

Step right up folks: http://www.braingate2.org/clinicalTrials.asp

I was thinking of signing up, but then I read that “Caution: Investigational Device.” Somehow my alligator brain kicked in, forming the words “guinea pig.” Not sure I want to have this procedure until they’ve perfected the technique. It’s not like I have a loss of any of my limbs (although my SO likes to think my head doesn’t always work right).

Still it would be way cool to get inanimate objects to respond to my every command. Like that Russian lady, Nina Kulagina.

Clifford Simak the author and TransAlchemy the Twitterer

Posted in Uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , , , on June 24, 2009 by suelange

Over at Twitter, there’s a bunch of Singularists that I follow. TransAlchemy is one such person. This particular Twitterer has put together an interesting YouTube video entitled “Message to our Descendents.” It’s a personal statement to all things human, now and in the future. He’s got several messages actually, each one to a different flavor of humanity: human born human, AI, and posthuman.

Sounds kind of United Nationsy, but actually it’s quite entertaining. There’s a driving music riff behind the thing, computer generated of course. No acoustic instruments. He’s also got a driving scroll of code in old-fashioned screen green flying past on the left side. And there’s coffee bar clatter and chatter in the background. In front of all this he thoughtfully delivers his messages.

The part that I found most interesting was at about the 3 ½ minute mark when he launches the message for AI and makes this chilling statement: “You would not have come about had it not been for humans that invented you.”

I know, what’s so scary about that? I’ll get to that. For now, know that I just finished reading Clifford Simak’s book “City.” The premise of this book is that the Dogs have inherited the Earth. They can speak and organize and are now the highest organic intelligence around. There isn’t a single human left walking about.

City is not a preachy book with a message about how if we don’t change our evil ways, this could be you. It’s mostly a picture of how evolution might go as we humans bumble along our technological time line. We could all end up moving completely off the planet and into a whole new species. On Earth the only record of human activity may one day exist only in the mind of a single robot. A really old robot. One that gets wistful about man’s greatest achievement: the evening cocktail.

The evening cocktail may very well be our greatest achievement, but for us humans here and now, we like to think we’ve done rather more than that. We have our great art, our great technological inventions. Certainly all that’s worth a mention. Truth is, though, our descendents may never appreciate any of it. We may be lucky if they even acknowledge it or us for that matter.

City was published in 50’s and so of course there’s no hint of the Singularity anywhere in the book. The thing that connects this non-Singularity book with TransAlchemy’s Singularity video is the fact that in City, the Dogs just can not get it through their heads that humans not only gave the Dogs their ability to talk, but they created the robots as well. The Dogs don’t want to believe that. Humans could never have achieved any of it. They simply weren’t capable.

Back in the here and now, TransAlchemy’s video tells the future AIs that humans created them. Maybe that won’t be future common knowledge. Maybe these AIs will not be enlightened on that point. I wonder if our technological descendents will laugh at the idea, just as Simak’s Dogs did. Are we, in the scheme of things, just so apparently incompetent?

Whoever inherits the Earth–Dogs, AIs, posthumans–may end up giving you and me credit for little more than the ability to make a great martini in the late afternoon.

I know, I know, is there really anything more important than that?

Scusteister
Follow Sue on Twitter

I Want One of These

Posted in Uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , , on June 16, 2009 by suelange

This falls in the “I want one of these” category:

http://www.afcea.org/signal/articles/templates/Signal_Article_Template.asp?articleid=1964&zoneid=263
Yeah, yeah, the soldiers’ weapons of death will be able to adapt to the desert and then switch over to jungle mode when called upon to do so. Our domination of the planet will be complete. That’s nice, but this thing is so much bigger than that.

Check out the tool box. You buy what amounts to a can of paint and inside you get any tool you’ll ever need. You want a wrench? Command “Wrench!” Voila. You have a wrench. This is so beyond nifty.

Changing from a wrench to a hammer is certainly great, but think of this: no more having to carry around a complete set of metric sockets as well as a complete set of English sockets in case you ever have to disassemble an appliance of unknown origin. Keep in mind the misery of the socket set completist. Half of any set of sockets, regardless which system it is, gets lost down the drain. Now you have to start buying the single pieces to replace the lost ones, but they don’t fit in the foam cutouts in the original carrying case because the new sockets are a different brand and they aren’t quite the same. Now you have to buy a big toolbox to hold all the floaters. Eventually the little things get lost in the mix of crap at the bottom of every toolbox, so now you have to go back and buy some more and…

You see what I’m saying here. This is so much bigger than one country beating the crap out of another country. What we’re talking about here is no less than an organized toolbox. Without actually having to organize it. Do you know how valuable that is?

Even beyond that, I’ve seen men in the tool department at Sears, drooling over the 52 piece sets of [screwdrivers/socket wrenches/router bits/wood chisels]. No one can justify buying a complete set of anything because you know you’ll never use more than just 4 or 5 of the basics, but still you want a complete set. It looks so neat and it comes with a carrying case.

This materials science here, this is a gold mine. All you do is buy that one paint can and you have a complete set of everything including a Dremel kit which no one ever uses but is necessary nonetheless. And the paint can is the carrying case.

The only monkey wrench I can see is that it seems like this only works with organic materials, i.e. long chain polymers, i.e. plastics. A really good tool, a hammer, or a wrench, say, is made from steel which is mostly iron and a little bit of carbon and maybe some other metals if it’s for a high end tool. Metal molecules don’t work like other molecules such as long chain organics. I wonder if the scientists will get the metals to behave correctly. To follow orders. To change shape on command.

I wouldn’t put a lot of money on a plastic screwdriver, even if it could turn into a hammer, or a wrench, or a crowbar at my verbal command. It would certainly be fun at a cocktail party, no doubt about that, but can it fix a flat on a highway in a rain storm in the middle of the night and then when I get home repair the fencing, finish the roofing, and snake out the plugged toilet?

Waiting with bated breath to find out.

Sue Lange’s BookShelf at BookViewCafe.com

The Flying Car is Here

Posted in Uncategorized with tags , , , on June 9, 2009 by suelange

Here’s a cool thing: the famous flying car is finally here: http://www.terrafugia.com/Video_News_Release.html

In 2006 the Boston Herald ran this article: http://www.terrafugia.com/news/archives/2006-0419-BostonHerald.pdf. Note the delivery date for the working prototype was 2008 with commercial product available by now. So we’re about a year behind schedule. Not bad. We’ll be seeing these things in the air in our lifetime.

Reality check: This is not a flying car. It’s a combo car/airplane meant to take off and land at airports, not your driveway. The idea is you use the car to drive to the airport and instead of paying for parking and buying a seat on a plane, you take off into the wild blue yonder yourself. I’m sure it won’t be as cheap as all that. I imagine there are fees to do this sort of thing, but I also can’t imagine that it will cost anywhere near what parking at Philly’s airport does. The last time I did that, the parking was more expensive than the flight.

At any rate, if you’re up for the twenty hours’ time it takes to get your pilot’s license as well as the amount of money it will cost to buy the thing (back in 2006 they predicted it would be about $50,000 cheaper than buying a Cessna 171) you will be the proud owner of a plane with retractable wings. A flight-enabled car, if you will. The great thing is that even if you can’t fly it home, you can at least park it in your driveway. These bragging rights alone will probably drive this industry.

Point is, this is not the George Jetson car plane we have all been waiting for. Too bad. So sad.

So what’s next then for the rest of us? Realistically what we are waiting for is the autopiloted car. How far away can it be? We’ve already got Matilde, the GPS hostess, recalculating every time we countermand her orders. She’s clever that Matilde is, and accurate. How long before she’s actually driving the vehicle without us? http://blogs.consumerreports.org/cars/2007/11/car-autopilot-t.html

The sooner we get this the better, in my opinion. As long as it’s got accident avoidance software and the sensory hardware to go with it, a computer will be better at driving under hazardous conditions such as at night in general, in blinding snow storms, in blinding rain storms, and with a pack of blind drunk teenagers in the car, than a human ever could be.

The one drawback with Matilde is that since she’s moved into the family, my orienteering skills have deteriorated. Now that I no longer use Rand McNally or Mapquest to get somewhere new, I’ve lost my ability to read maps and figure out how to get to strange places in my neighborhood. Matilde has dumbed me down. Things are safer and more efficient with the GPS system, but we are all definitely getting dumber.

Even pre-Singularity, we are losing our survival skills.

Scusteister
,